Monday, 27 June 2016

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR - What is the problem in the case



WE PREPARE & PROVIDE MBA, EMBA, BMS, GDM, DMS, PGDBM, MIS, MIB , PDM CASE STUDY ANSWERS, ASSIGNMENT SOLUTIONS, PROJECT REPORTS AND THESIS
ARAVIND - 09901366442 – 09902787224





ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR





(a) What is the problem in the case?


(b) How do you see the behavior of the safety supervisor? What would you do if you were the safety supervisor ?


(c) How do you see the change in John's behavior from an informal leader to the one involved in a fight with a supervisor vis-a-vis the company's policy?


(d) Could Mr. Prasad and the safety supervisor have prevented John's case at the initial level?


(a) What is the problem in the case? Explain.


(b) Explain Govinda's behavior and work experience vis-a-vis the psychologist's report.


(c) How do you see Nair's suggestion to Amrit? Give reasons.


(d) What are Amrit's considerations in taking a decision? What should he do? Explain.


(a) Define the major problem of EMCORP's management.


(b) Will the formation of a committee be of any value in this situation? If a committee is needed, assign a title to the committee and indicate who should be members of the committee?


(c) In the event that Roy decides to retire, will the presence of a committee make it easier or more difficult for Roy's successor? Discuss.


(a) What is your view of the action taken by Mr. Muthu?


(b) What are the weakness and strong points, as you consider, of Mr. Muthu as a Manager?
(c) How would you have tackled the situation, if you were Mr. Muthu?


(a) How did a brilliant engineer turn out to be a “deadwood”?


(b) Was Mr. Mohan too sensitive and arrogant?


(c) Did Mr. Tagore handle sensitive and intelligent engineers properly?


(d) Was it not advisable to transfer Mr. Mohan in 1992 when the signs of trouble were seen?


(e) Should Mr. Tagore have stopped Mr. Mohan’s increment in 1993, knowing fully well that he was quite competent?





No comments:

Post a Comment